About Me

Name: Dana Tuszke
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

Recap of Republican All-American Debate

I caught the last half hour of the Republican All-American Forum last night on PBS.  I was very impressed by the candidates that actually made the time to appear on the televised debate.

I have to confess that early on, I didn't like any of the Republican candidates.  It's very difficult to decipher who is real and who is pretending.

But, oh, how Governor Mike Huckabee shined.  He was confident, he spoke clearly and at a pace that didn't make me nervous like that of Congressman Ron Paul.  Huckabee made eye contact with the audience, with host Travis Smiley and the journalists, Cynthia Tucker, Ray Suarez and Juan Williams.

The segment I was able to watch was about Employment Disparity.

When Cynthia Tucker said, "Governor, I want to ask about race and unemployment.  In 2006, the unemployment rate of black high school graduates was 33% higher than the unemployment rate of white high school dropouts.  What do you think accounts for that in equity?"

Governor Huckabee said that part of it is because there is still racism in this country and the opportunities aren't the same.  Some of it has to do with the fact that there are people who unfortunately, still look at a person's face, and the color of their skin, and that's something that government can't change, but leadership certainly can speak to.
Huckabee stated that one of the things that all of us need to be aware of is that there isn't an equal opportunity for every American yet.  "We can say there is, but it's not true," he said.
candidate who admits that racism is real and still existent in this country.  Especially when so many politicians avoid the topic of race.

Huckabee stressed that it is important that all Americans have the same opportunities as everyone else.

Congressman Ron Paul spoke rather fast during the debates and I found it difficult to listen to him.  He answered Cynthia Tucker's question by talking about a stronger economy and better minimum wage laws.  He said we need sound government laws, sound wages, a sound economy.  He mentioned a bill that would allow wait staff, or people trying to get a head start in life should not have to pay taxes the first few years until they get ahead.  I'm not certain how that would work.  But it is intriguing.

Senator Sam Brownback stated that clearly, we still do not have a color blind society.  He also admitted that racism is still here in the United States.  He also talked about economic growth and the need for an optional tax flat for areas that need opportunities to grow.

Congressman Tom Tancredo said he does not agree with these "race baiting" comments about why we have these problems.  It has nothing to do with race, he said, but with the welfare system. He stated that two things have devastated the black community when it comes to economic opportunity.  First, the welfare state has paid people to be at home and not in the workforce, and the millions of imported, low income workers that have depressed the wage rates for the lowest incomes among us.  I don't believe the welfare state has made it difficult for black Americans to find jobs.  I think the lack of jobs and the racism that still exists in the U.S. has given black Americans no other choice but to use welfare that is available to them.

Congressman Duncan Hunter said that Republicans in the 90s, when former President Clinton was in office, initiated legislation three times to reform the welfare system.  He stated that Clinton vetoed the bill twice, signed the third time and then took credit for it.  I was turned off by this implied "slam" and I don't even like Bill Clinton.    

When the welfare reform took place, Hunter said, the number of jobs for single moms went up, families did much better and the average income went up, and according to HHS, there was a 33% increase in jobs for those families on welfare.  He stressed the importance of jobs being available in the community for all Americans and the importance of helping the small businessman.  I can't argue with that.  My father owned a business and struggle with high taxes and low profits for most of his ownership.

Ambassador Alan Keyes, believes that there are no moral foundations and family structure in the black community.  He said that black men today find job opportunities in prison.  That is something that reflects that when you allow the family to break down and allow the father to be driven from the home, you have established the conditions for the upbringing of children to be non-productive, to be violent and to be turned in directions that will be destructive of their economic community.  He stressed that a culture of promiscuity, selfish hedonism, that leads people to believe that the major partnership isn't important, the you have especially destroyed the black community.  Ambassador Keyes caught my attention with his remarks and I was very impressed with his passion for his beliefs.

Overall, I'd say that each candidate presented himself in a positive way.  I'm still reviewing the parts of the debate I missed.  You can watch them by clicking this link.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

HillaryCare 2.0

**Cross-posted from BlogHer.org.


The first time Hillary Clinton was "in office" she tried to come up with a plan for universal health care for all Americans. I was only 14 when Clinton was the head of the Task Force on National Health Care Reform, but I remember discussing the speech that her husband, President Bill Clinton, gave in September 1993 in my ninth grade civics class.

He spoke about how millions of Americans "are just a pink slip away from losing their health insurance, and one serious illness away from losing all their savings." My family was uninsured in 1993. My father was self-employed and couldn't afford the extremely high costs of private insurance.

President Clinton's statement is still true today. Forty-seven million Americans are uninsured. These 47 million Americans cannot afford the cost of coverage, and Hillary Clinton believes her health care plan is going to fix the corrupt system that is health insurance.

The failure of Hillary's first attempt at health care reform was largely due to several conservatives, libertarians and insurance companies lobbying against her "Health Security" plan, calling it overly bureaucratic and restrictive of patient choice.

There's the word that makes people swoon and cringe simultaneously: Choice. It's an interesting rhetoric, as Ezra Klein said in a Slate article.

What is now being dubbed HillaryCare 2.0, Clinton appears to have learned her lesson, calling it the "American Health Choices Plan" or "Individual Mandate" plan. Clinton assures Americans will be able to keep their current health coverage if they wish to do so, while allowing businesses and their employees more choices of health plans.

Crystal Patterson of HillaryClinton.com blogs about some of the highlights of Clinton's plan:

* Affordable: Unlike the current health system where insurance premiums send people into bankruptcy, the plan provides tax credits for working families to help them cover their costs. The tax credits will ensure that working families never have to pay more than a limited percentage of their income for healthcare.

* Available: No discrimination. The insurance companies can't deny you coverage if you have a pre-existing condition.

* Reliable: It's portable. If you change or lose your job, you keep your health care.

As for small business owners, like my father, Patterson says "Hillary would give tax credits to small businesses that provide healthcare to their workers to help defray their coverage costs. This will make small businesses more competitive and help create good jobs with health benefits that will stay here in the US."

This plan sounds too good to be true! Am I the only one who is skeptical? Hardly.

Rich Lowry writes:

Clinton's plan would make this ramshackle system worse. She proposes more regulations on insurers and a mandate on large employers to provide insurance coverage or pay a tax. The regulations will make insurance even more expensive, while the employer mandate would only augment the current senseless system of people getting insurance through their jobs.

Ezra Klein writes:

If I were going to not like Hillary Clinton's health care plan, this would be the case I'd make. As it is, I think the areas in which she's vague are not areas in which she'll fail: No politician will create an individual mandate plan and then not offer adequate subsidies. The resulting outrage from families who couldn't afford healthcare but were legally obligated to buy it would destroy their career, doom their reelection, and kill the plan.

Klein also wrote about the HillaryCare ad now airing in New Hampshire.

Darleen's Place writes:

I won't argue that there are not serious problems with how our current health industry delivers its services and products; however, much of the imbalance is the direct result of governmental policies ...

... policies that Hillary! wants to expand and entrench.

Katherine Kersten of Think Again writes:

"Clinton seems to understand that her new plan must involve no trade-offs, and promise something for everyone. Hillary Care II will apparently require insurance companies to insure everyone. Aides claim that it will mean lower costs, and higher quality health care, across the board... ...Is such a health care heaven possible?"

Calmer Than You Are writes:

"Americans like choice and Hitlery knows that so she is pretending that her plan gives us choice. We can choose to participate or not participate in her health care plan. That sounds wonderful but the government is going to be responsible for financing the new American HMO and employers will no longer be providing health care options to their employees."

Fred Thompson offers his reaction to HillaryCare with this video, saying "What is it that makes liberals think the best way to help somebody is to punish them?”

Red Clay Citizen writes:

"Billary is at it again. "HillaryCare 2.0" - socialized medicine for America - could be on its way to a hospital near you. The alternative? -- apparently the Massachusetts-style insurance connector program proposed by Mitt Romney. The two programs are similar in that the government will require everyone to have health insurance (even illegal immigrants? -- Uh ... Billary doesn't know yet)."

Elizabeth Edwards has her own concerns. She accused Clinton of copying the health care plan outlined more than seven months ago by her husband, John. Edwards said:

"Does Mrs. Clinton's plan seem very familiar to you? Mrs. Clinton has, seven and a half months after John unveiled his health care plan, unveiled a health care plan that is in every material respect just like John's."

Townhall.com reported that Edwards calls Clinton's plan "John Edwards' health care plan as delivered by Hillary Clinton."

Reflections by Kris had this reaction to Mrs. Edwards statement:

"She doesn't sound like she's campaigning for her husband, she sounds like she's running her own campaign."

Yes, I too, would like to know why Mr. Edwards isn't speaking up for himself and calling Hillary out on the stolen goods?

To be fair, Hillary's plan is similar to John Edwards'. From the New York Times last February:

The Edwards plan would provide tax credits or subsidies to low-income families who cannot afford health insurance, expand Medicare and the federal program of health care for children, and create a federal health insurance agency that could become the basis for a single-payer system that would eventually do away with private health insurance.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »